<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acceptable Use of Factory Presets and Samples?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/</link>
	<description>Recipes for Sound Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audio Cookbook Blog Archive Acceptable Use of Factory Presets &#124; patio umbrella</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-6328</link>
		<dc:creator>Audio Cookbook Blog Archive Acceptable Use of Factory Presets &#124; patio umbrella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-6328</guid>
		<description>[...] Audio Cookbook Blog Archive Acceptable Use of Factory Presets   Posted by root 18 minutes ago (http://audiocookbook.org)        Preset loops from garageband for instance rihanna umbrella for example only factory presets from you choice daw post a comment name required powered by wordpress entries rss comments rss        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Audio Cookbook Blog Archive Acceptable Use of Factory Presets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Audio Cookbook Blog Archive Acceptable Use of Factory Presets   Posted by root 18 minutes ago (<a href="http://audiocookbook.org"  rel="nofollow">http://audiocookbook.org</a>)        Preset loops from garageband for instance rihanna umbrella for example only factory presets from you choice daw post a comment name required powered by wordpress entries rss comments rss        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Audio Cookbook Blog Archive Acceptable Use of Factory Presets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saronni</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Saronni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-788</guid>
		<description>Hey Peter, I play a late 90&#039;s Fender Jazz bass with active electronics. Pretty simple EQ really. More back pickup than front. Bass at five and I usually have my treble setting pretty low since this bass has such a bright sound on it&#039;s own. I think we used a little mild compression and some verb in spots near the end of the song. I&#039;m lucky to have such an instrument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Peter, I play a late 90&#8242;s Fender Jazz bass with active electronics. Pretty simple EQ really. More back pickup than front. Bass at five and I usually have my treble setting pretty low since this bass has such a bright sound on it&#8217;s own. I think we used a little mild compression and some verb in spots near the end of the song. I&#8217;m lucky to have such an instrument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Manos</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Manos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-787</guid>
		<description>what kind of bass did you use how did you eq,compress,etc. sounded great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what kind of bass did you use how did you eq,compress,etc. sounded great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev on music</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>kev on music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-685</guid>
		<description>one way or the other one has to admire your pursuit for new sounds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one way or the other one has to admire your pursuit for new sounds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Keston</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>John Keston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Kev, you hit the nail on its head. But I would argue that often the variety of presets available is the paralyzing factor. The first experience I had with too many choices was owning a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vintagesynth.com/roland/d50.shtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roland D-50&lt;/a&gt; back in 1987. I found myself stumbling through presets at rehearsals for months until I manged to tweak a few patches into usable sounds. 

I was floored by the D-50s capabilities, but had trouble getting it to work in an ensemble. Ultimately the lack of limitations and button driven interfaces let to me largely abandoning contemporary keyboards in favor of vintage synths and the Rhodes electric piano. I have only gotten back into them in the last ten years or so with the advent of analog modeling and virtual instruments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kev, you hit the nail on its head. But I would argue that often the variety of presets available is the paralyzing factor. The first experience I had with too many choices was owning a <a href="http://www.vintagesynth.com/roland/d50.shtml"  target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Roland D-50</a> back in 1987. I found myself stumbling through presets at rehearsals for months until I manged to tweak a few patches into usable sounds. </p>
<p>I was floored by the D-50s capabilities, but had trouble getting it to work in an ensemble. Ultimately the lack of limitations and button driven interfaces let to me largely abandoning contemporary keyboards in favor of vintage synths and the Rhodes electric piano. I have only gotten back into them in the last ten years or so with the advent of analog modeling and virtual instruments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev on music</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>kev on music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-680</guid>
		<description>must agree with Chad

&quot;Composition trumps texture, always. Spirit and intent are more important than both of them.&quot;

Making a district sound takes indefinite number of choices to be made / parameters to  be tweaked. Too many choices are always paralyzing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must agree with Chad</p>
<p>&#8220;Composition trumps texture, always. Spirit and intent are more important than both of them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Making a district sound takes indefinite number of choices to be made / parameters to  be tweaked. Too many choices are always paralyzing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poopoo</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>poopoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-679</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like serving take away at a dinner party.  

It&#039;s a matter of pride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like serving take away at a dinner party.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of pride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audio Cookbook &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Copy Bad Copy</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Audio Cookbook &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Good Copy Bad Copy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-678</guid>
		<description>[...] conversation happening under Acceptable Use of Factory Presets and Samples? is starting to reflect the subject matter that is examined in the film Good Copy Bad Copy, so I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conversation happening under Acceptable Use of Factory Presets and Samples? is starting to reflect the subject matter that is examined in the film Good Copy Bad Copy, so I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Keston</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>John Keston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Nicely said, Chad. There are so many factors involved in this topic. Guy makes some great points too relating to specific genres. I would never go so far as to say using presets is vulgar, nor fault anyone for using them effectively. Upon reflection, I use them more than I like to admit, although usually with some sort of twist. And the philosophy of use-it-if-it-works makes complete sense. 

But it gets a little old hearing a sound made popular by someone else thrown into dozens of other songs and jingles. At that stage it becomes a &quot;sound of the month&quot; and is not being used so much creatively, but more so being exploited for commercial gain. Am I exposing my socialistic tendencies here? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely said, Chad. There are so many factors involved in this topic. Guy makes some great points too relating to specific genres. I would never go so far as to say using presets is vulgar, nor fault anyone for using them effectively. Upon reflection, I use them more than I like to admit, although usually with some sort of twist. And the philosophy of use-it-if-it-works makes complete sense. </p>
<p>But it gets a little old hearing a sound made popular by someone else thrown into dozens of other songs and jingles. At that stage it becomes a &#8220;sound of the month&#8221; and is not being used so much creatively, but more so being exploited for commercial gain. Am I exposing my socialistic tendencies here? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://audiocookbook.org/one-sound-every-day/acceptable-use-of-factory-presets-and-samples/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://audiocookbook.org/?p=1286#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Write a great song.  &quot;Strawberry Fields Forever&quot; uses a flute &quot;preset&quot; on a mellotron.

Now it is thought of as the &quot;Strawberry Fields Forever&quot; sound.

Composition trumps texture, always.  Spirit and intent are more important than both of them.

My advice: Don&#039;t be self-conscious about being original.  Just follow your instincts and use your imagination.  I would hate for John Lennon et al to have altered the sound of &quot;Strawberry Fields Forever&quot; out of some neurotic concern for using a stock sound.

I enjoy this blog quite a bit, by the way.  I respect your love of sound.  I can understand that, when you put as much emphasis on sound design as you do, the concept of a &quot;preset&quot; is vulgar.

But I still say The Song always wins over The Sound.

- c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Write a great song.  &#8220;Strawberry Fields Forever&#8221; uses a flute &#8220;preset&#8221; on a mellotron.</p>
<p>Now it is thought of as the &#8220;Strawberry Fields Forever&#8221; sound.</p>
<p>Composition trumps texture, always.  Spirit and intent are more important than both of them.</p>
<p>My advice: Don&#8217;t be self-conscious about being original.  Just follow your instincts and use your imagination.  I would hate for John Lennon et al to have altered the sound of &#8220;Strawberry Fields Forever&#8221; out of some neurotic concern for using a stock sound.</p>
<p>I enjoy this blog quite a bit, by the way.  I respect your love of sound.  I can understand that, when you put as much emphasis on sound design as you do, the concept of a &#8220;preset&#8221; is vulgar.</p>
<p>But I still say The Song always wins over The Sound.</p>
<p>- c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

